Bruce Uhlman, Jim Andrews, Arlis Kadrmas, Luke Egan, BASF; Tim Harrawood, Vance Brothers
Summary
The use of micro surfacing results in 54% less energy usage, 35% less raw material usage, 44% less green house gas release, and a 28% reduction in life cycle cost compared to a traditional 2 inch mill and fill treatment.
Citations
This Eco-efficiency Analysis (EEA) evaluates the environmental impact of the production, use, and disposal of micro surfacing in the areas of energy and resource consumption, emissions, toxicity and risk potential, and land use. The EEA also evaluates the life cycle costs associated with micro surfacing by calculating the costs related to, at a minimum, materials, labor, manufacturing, waste disposal, and energy.
Let's Connect
Get the latest in industry trends, research, success stories, and technical updates in a succinct e-newsletter.
PPRA Industry News Signup
Thank you!
Thank you for signing up for the PPRA mailing list!
If you created an account, you should receive an email shortly with more instructions to activate your account.